Spotlight Review

Posted: March 21, 2016 in Movie Reviews
Tags: , , ,
Best Picture?

Reviewed by Mason Manuel 

In the wake of the recent Best Picture win at the Oscars, I was remiss that I had never seen Spotlight. Popping it in a week later, I was expecting to experience the same amount of exhilaration that I had with the other candidates. Starring an impressive cast and crew while tackling a very controversial issue, Spotlight has everything working for it. But while the performances and story are decent and moving at times, a film of the ages this is not. Though assuredly interesting and even anger inducing, Spotlight does not deserve Best Picture. That’s not to say it’s a bad film though.

Taking place in Boston in the middle of the early 2000s, a group of reporters for The Boston Globe (A.K.A. the “Spotlight” team) get a whiff of a large scandal happening within the Catholic Church resulting in molested children. However, they are hesitant to go after the church until their new editor Marty Baron (Liev Schreiber) comes in and softhandedly demands that they investigate. Catholicism is very prominent in Boston and the Spotlight team is justifiably worried that this will paint a target on their back but they go ahead with the story anyway.  The team finds themselves not only opposed by the church but by the community as well. Nevertheless they press on to uncover one of the largest scandals in history.

The team is made up of Michael Rezendes (Mark Ruffalo), Walter “Robby” Robinson (Michael Keaton), Sacha Pfeiffer (Rachel McAdams), and others whose names you won’t remember. To their credit the cast gives some of the best acting of their collective lives while slowly uncovering that the city they know and love has been hiding such a dark secret. Boston is a character in and of itself from the shiny urban areas in the financial district to the urban decay as the camera takes us farther from the city’s shiny center. Bu despite the actors putting forth their best (especially Ruffalo), the material they deliver gets increasingly dull as time goes on. The uncovering of this scandal was huge and had networks and people talking for years but the movie just has scene after scene of people simply standing still and talking in classroom like environments. I get that journalism is mostly just that; asking questions and trading information with fellow journalists, but a film requires more to keep the proceedings entertaining and Spotlight fails to do so.

Though our journalists are definitely warriors of truth they never come off as idolized. None of them are perfect, everyone has a flaw or a lapse of judgment that makes them feel legitimately human. There were times where these people would be fighting so hard for the truth and I had to ask myself if they were doing it for the children in danger or because they simply wanted a good story that would make headlines. Some of these faults are larger than others and there is even a huge twist at the end that is continuously hinted at that I did not even see until it was revealed. There is a delightfully slow burn here with some of the topics that make the reveal so fulfilling, but there are times where it could have moved SO much faster.

Spotlight is a good film. It just was not the best film of 2016 and that bothers me. I get that Best Picture winners normally tackle large political or sociological issues with grace which Spotlight wholeheartedly did, but in terms of film production and overall execution it stays simply above average. It’s an excellent film that is worth the watch – just don’t expect me to get over the Mad Max: Fury Road loss any time soon. RDR gives Spotlight a 7.8 out of 10.

spot

Advertisements
Comments
  1. I couldn’t agree with you more on Spotlight. Good film, but is it great? No. Will I remember it years from now? Probably not. It’s very forgettable despite a few quasi-good performances. I don’t get the hype outside of the controversial issue.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. neil allen says:

    You missed the point. It didn’t get Best Picture because of special effects.

    It got Best Picture because Spotlight is powerful enough to literally change the religion of tens of millions of people.

    No other movie in history did that, and Hollywood will acknowledge it’s power, rewarding itself, as it should.

    This movie will have a more dramatic impact on people’s lives than any movie ever made, and Hollywood doesn’t want to be remembered as the institution that didn’t understand that.

    Spotlight is one of the most disgusting organized crime films ever made, featuring 271 Catholic priests who raped children in Boston, and hundreds of other priests who hid, protected and moved them. For their god.

    Like

    • Mason Manuel says:

      The special effects of max were great but that’s not why I think it is superior. It’s simply a more cohesive film. Spotlight had the daunting task of making digging through hundreds of documents and talking in rooms interesting and I don’t feel that it pulled that off. And my favorite crime film is Goodfellas but that’s just me. Plus I get its fiction so I’m kind of cheating but still. The scandal was huge and should be publicized but I don’t think it made a memorable film.

      Like

  3. I think this won Best Picture because it was on members of the Academy’s “Best Picture” list. Not because it was Number 1 on their list but because it made their list the most. Basically, the Academy counts the most votes overall, not the most “number one” vote.

    At some point, I will watch this and give my views on the film.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s